Introduction:

The Supreme Court rejected the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) plea to cancel the bail granted to Rajeev Saxena, an accused-turned-approver in the AgustaWestland Chopper Scam. The CBI argued non-cooperation from Saxena during the investigation. The court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, dismissed the application but allowed the CBI to approach the Trial Court. The case involves allegations against Saxena and others, including Christian Michel, related to the VVIP chopper deal. Saxena had been granted pardon to turn approver, and the recent CBI attempt to cancel his bail was based on perceived non-compliance.

Arguments of Both Sides:

The CBI, represented by Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, contended that Saxena was uncooperative, not providing documents, answering questions, or responding to summons adequately. The CBI sought directions for Saxena to cooperate fully with the investigation. On the other side, Saxena’s original bail order highlighted his cooperation during the investigation.

Court’s Judgement:

The Supreme Court, after deliberation, refused to interfere with Saxena’s bail, citing his past cooperation recorded by the Trial Judge. However, it granted the CBI the liberty to move an application before the Trial Court to address non-cooperation concerns. The court’s decision maintains Saxena’s bail status but signals a window for the CBI to pursue further action at the Trial Court Level.