Introduction:

In a recent development, the Jammu and Kashmir High Court has taken a proactive stance on the issue of stray dogs, emphasizing the need for coordinated action from various stakeholders. The bench, comprising Chief Justice N. Kotiswar Singh and Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, made these observations in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) regarding the escalating incidents of stray dog attacks in the region. The court acknowledged the efforts of the State Level Implementation and Monitoring Committee but expressed concerns about the efficacy of existing measures and the reliance solely on NGOs to address the issue.

Arguments of Both Sides:

The petitioners highlighted the shortcomings of current measures and advocated for stricter Animal Birth Control (ABC) programs and sterilization drives. On the other hand, the authorities emphasized the role of NGOs and the efforts of the State Level Implementation and Monitoring Committee in addressing the stray dog issue. However, the court raised concerns about the sustainability of relying solely on NGOs and stressed the need for active participation from government authorities.

Court’s Judgment:

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court directed the administration to submit a comprehensive report on the effectiveness of the decisions made by the State Level Implementation and Monitoring Committee. The court emphasized the importance of sustained participation from government authorities and suggested the formation of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) within the Urban Development Department to manage stray dogs effectively. Additionally, the court sought suggestions from law students representing the Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Legal Aid to incorporate into future directives.