Introduction:

The Supreme Court intervenes in a writ petition regarding the ban on live screenings of Lord Ram’s Pran Pratishta ceremony in Ayodhya by the Tamil Nadu Government. A BJP leader filed the petition, alleging a violation of religious rights. The Court emphasizes the importance of balancing religious freedom and safety protocols in its directives.

Arguments:

The petitioner, a BJP leader, contends that the Tamil Nadu government imposed restrictions on live screenings and religious ceremonies related to the Ram Mandir consecration. The Court acknowledges concerns about potential violations of religious rights and asserts that permission cannot be denied based solely on the presence of other communities. The State justifies its actions, citing law and order concerns, while the petitioner accuses the ruling party of undermining religious practices.

Court’s Judgement:

The Supreme Court records the Tamil Nadu Government’s assurance that there is no ban on live screenings and religious activities related to the Ayodhya ceremony. The Court emphasizes that applications for such events must be decided on merit, with reasons provided for approvals or rejections. The order highlights the need for a balanced approach, respecting religious traditions while considering law and order concerns. The Court disapproves of oral orders and ensures that the authorities act within the bounds of the law.