Introduction:

The Madras High Court recently confronted Oreva company’s director, Jaysukh Patel, over non-compliance with court orders regarding the Morbi bridge collapse. Despite initially issuing a contempt notice, the court accepted Oreva’s apology, urging the company to present concrete proposals for rehabilitating the victims.

Arguments:

During the hearing, Oreva’s counsel, Unawalla, presented two affidavits addressing the delay in filing replies and compensation discrepancies. The company pledged to provide Rs 12,000 monthly aid to victims, aligning with the state government. However, the court expressed dissatisfaction, stressing Oreva’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) and demanding more than mere remorse from the company.

Court’s Judgment:

While accepting Oreva’s apology, the Madras High Court urged the company to develop a comprehensive rehabilitation proposal for victims. The court emphasized the severity of the situation and Oreva’s obligation to rectify its faults, urging proactive measures tailored to the victims’needs.