Introduction:

The Delhi High Court rejects bail for Salim Malik alias Munna in a case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, alleging involvement in the 2020 North-East Delhi riots. The court’s decision underscores the seriousness of the charges and the alleged role of Malik in the larger conspiracy behind the riots.

Arguments:

Advocate Mr. Salman Khurshid, representing the appellant, argues for bail, emphasizing the need for a fair trial and challenging the sufficiency of evidence against Malik. On the other hand, Mr. Amit Prasad, Special Public Prosecutor, contends that there is substantial material implicating Malik as a co-conspirator in the riots, justifying his continued detention.

Court’s Judgment:

The Delhi High Court, comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Manoj Jain, denies bail to Malik, citing ample evidence of his involvement in planning and inciting violence during meetings preceding the riots. The court emphasizes the seriousness of the allegations and the need to prevent further unrest. It invokes provisions of the UAPA, highlighting the gravity of the offense and the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses if Malik were to be released on bail.