Introduction:

In a recent ruling, the Single Bench of Justice Prateek Jalan of the Delhi High Court recognized the validity of serving a petition via WhatsApp and Email, based on the details provided in the agreement between the parties. The case involved a dispute arising from a lease agreement, where the petitioner sought arbitration due to non-response from the respondent. The Court’s decision sheds light on the evolving methods of legal service in the digital age.

Arguments of Both Sides:

The petitioner, represented by Mr. Akhilesh Pradhan, proposed the appointment of an arbitrator after the respondent failed to respond to arbitration proceedings. The Court directed the petitioner to serve the petition via WhatsApp and Email, in addition to traditional methods like speed post. While the respondent did not appear in court, the affidavit filed by the petitioner demonstrated successful service through virtual modes.

Court’s Judgment:

Justice Jalan noted that the service of the petition through WhatsApp and Email, as per the details mentioned in the agreement, constituted valid service. Despite the speed post returning due to the respondent’s absence, the Court deemed the respondents duly served and proceeded with arbitration. The Court’s decision highlights the importance of adapting legal procedures to modern communication channels and ensuring effective service of documents.