Introduction:

In a recent case before the Allahabad High Court involving Rajendra Bajpai v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the Court raised significant concerns over the sluggish pace of development in cremation site infrastructure across the state. Justices Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Prashant Kumar highlighted the pressing issue of inadequate facilities juxtaposed with the escalating population growth, emphasizing the plight of common citizens in accessing proper amenities, even in their final rites.

Arguments of Both Sides:

The case stemmed from a writ plea filed by Rajendra Bajpai, addressing the insufficient facilities at the Shamshanghat in Bithoor. The Court noted the dire conditions prevalent in crematoriums throughout the state, lacking basic amenities and infrastructure. Initially, the response from the Secretary, Nagar Vikas, Government of Uttar Pradesh, highlighted the autonomy of Urban Local Bodies in maintaining urban cremation sites, while the Panchayati Raj Department was cited as responsible for rural areas. This led to a debate about the proper authority for regulation and maintenance of these sites.

Court’s Judgment:

Observing the inadequacies in both urban and rural cremation facilities, the Court directed the inclusion of the Additional Chief Secretary of the Panchayati Raj Department and Urban Development as party respondents. The aim was to solicit their responses and address the lack of a concrete policy regarding the development and maintenance of cremation sites. The matter is scheduled for the next hearing on January 18, 2024, signifying the Court’s commitment to resolving the pressing issue.