preloader image

Loading...

The Legal Affair

Let's talk Law

The Legal Affair

Let's talk Law

Author: roshni.parwani

  • Home
  • Supreme Court Requests MP Government To Review 75% Domicile Quota In B.Ed Seats After Declaring Wholesale Domicile Reservation Unconstitutional
Image

01/05/2023, 3 years ago

Supreme Court Requests MP Government To Review 75% Domicile Quota In B.Ed Seats After Declaring Wholesale Domicile Reservation Unconstitutional

Factual Background  In the matter of Veena Vadini Teachers Training Institute v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors A college called Veena Vadini Samaj Kalyan Vikash Samiti is run by the appellant. The school prepares teachers for the state of Madhya Pradesh’s B.Ed. and M.Ed. programmes. The appellant institute is having trouble admitting students because […]

Image

01/05/2023, 3 years ago

SEBI seeks 6-month extension from Supreme Court for Hindenburg report investigation

Factual Matrix  In the matter of Vishal Tiwari vs Union of India and ors The Securities and Exchange Board of India requested a six-month extension from the Supreme Court in order to finish its investigation into the controversy surrounding the Hindenburg Research report on the Adani Group of Companies, as well as claims made against […]

Image

01/05/2023, 3 years ago

Madras HC Rules That Deceased Daughter’s Mother Is Legal Heir for Arrears Alimony

Factual Background  In the case of Annadurai v Jaya, The husband is the petitioner. The petitioner’s mother-in-law is the respondent. In 1991, the petitioner got married Saraswathi, the respondent’s daughter. They split up as a result of miscommunication. By submitting a divorce petition in accordance with Section 13 (1)(i)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, the […]

Image

01/05/2023, 3 years ago

Corroboration Evidence is not Mandatory which Victim’s Testimony should carry a lot of weight: Allahabad High Court

Factual Matrix  In the case of Raje v. State of UP victim girl left her house at around 6:30 a.m. to use a public toilet in the West of her village. As she was returning home after using the public toilet, the accused Raje @ Rajesh @ Santosh Kumar Shukla, who was hiding in Arhar […]

Image

01/05/2023, 3 years ago

Delhi High Court Affirms Arbitrator’s Decision while Dismissing Lis Pendens

Factual Background  In the case of Jayant Kumar Ghosh Outdoor Catering (P) Ltd v. State of Maharashtra the state of Maharashtra awarded the appellant company, Ghosh Catering, a contract after it met the conditions of the tender that was requested. However, on the representation of a third party, the state terminated the contract on the […]

Image

29/04/2023, 3 years ago

Delhi High Court Direct government to supply food at homeless women’s shelter

Introduction   The Delhi High Court took suo motu notice of claims that a shelter for single homeless women in the capital had run out of food and that its residents were now being driven to begging on the streets. It was reported that 60 homeless single women are living in the shelter, including elderly and […]

Image

29/04/2023, 3 years ago

Delhi High Court restricts Calcutta News from adopting a logo resembling CNN’s

Factual background  In the case of Cable News Network Inc v CTVN According to a lawsuit filed by Cable News Network against Calcutta Television Network Pvt Ltd., the defendant only started using the name Calcutta News and the initials CN in 2014 after operating under the name Uttar Bangla up until that point.CNN claimed that […]

Image

29/04/2023, 3 years ago

NCDRC’s order of 2 crores to compensate a Model for a poor haircut was overturned by the Supreme Court

Factual Background  In the matter of Aashna Roy vs Chairman ITC and Anr. Aashna Roy, the petitioner, was scheduled to attend for an interview on April 12, but first went to the ITC Maurya Hotel’s salon in New Delhi for a haircut. She requested to see her normal hairstylist, but while she was out of […]

Image

29/04/2023, 3 years ago

Delhi High Court Takes Action Against False Representation of Starbucks Franchisees

Factual background  In the case of Starbucks Corporation and Anr v. National Interest Exchange of India Starbucks filed a claim alleging that a number of unidentified entities were falsely representing themselves as its authorized franchisees and deceiving the public. According to section 103 of the Trade Marks Act of 1999, those found guilty of falsely […]

1 … 56 57 58 59 60 … 79

The Legal Affair © 2026 Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions