preloader image

Loading...

The Legal Affair

Let's talk Law

The Legal Affair

Let's talk Law

Author: roshni.parwani

  • Home
  • Bombay High Court Reinstates Kirtankar Case: Alleged Violation of PCPNDT Act and Sex Discrimination
Image

21/06/2023, 3 years ago

Bombay High Court Reinstates Kirtankar Case: Alleged Violation of PCPNDT Act and Sex Discrimination

Factual Matrix  In the matter of Ranjana Pagar-Gawande v. Nivrutti Kashinath Deshmukh a group of petitions concerning a challenge to a common order that an additional sessions judge had issued and that had been annulled and set aside by a magistrate A complaint was made under Section 28(1) of the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of […]

Image

21/06/2023, 3 years ago

Bombay High Court: No Conflict between Arbitration Act and IBC Code Sections 7-9

Factual Background  In the Matter of Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. J. Poonamchand & Sons In the plea, it was asserted that the provisions of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 would not apply because the respondent had approached the National Company Law Tribunal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code […]

Image

20/06/2023, 3 years ago

Manipur High Court orders limited internet services under state supervision

Introduction Matrix In the Matter of Aribam Dhananjoy Sharma v. State of Manipur Internet service restoration in the State of Manipur is the subject of public interest litigation requests. Analysis of court decision  The State is required to offer limited internet services to the general people in specifically designated locations under the authority of the […]

Image

20/06/2023, 3 years ago

Employees have a fundamental right to maternity and paternity leave, promoting social fairness and motherhood dignity: Himachal Pradesh HC

Factual Matrix  In the matter of State of H.P. V. Sita Devi The State of Himachal Pradesh filed a Writ Petition in opposition to the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal’s Order granting the respondent the benefits of deemed maternity leave and, as a result, the conferral of work-charge status after completing eight years of service. In […]

Image

20/06/2023, 3 years ago

Delhi High Court Frees Narcotics Trafficking Suspect: Lack of Evidence Leads to Exoneration

Background Matrix  In the matter of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v Nitish Kumar On acquiring precise information about some illegal products that were imported into India and were lying at ICD Tughlakabad, New Delhi after being confiscated, a case was filed. The illegal goods were concealed in four containers that were declared to contain rock […]

Image

20/06/2023, 3 years ago

Madhya Pradesh HC Rules FIR Allegations Not Constituting Abetment of Suicide

Factual Background  In the case of Shubham v. State of M.P, a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for the cancellation of an initial police report (FIR) filed for an offence under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), as well as any subsequent criminal actions […]

Image

20/06/2023, 3 years ago

Karnataka High Court’s Landmark Ruling: Non-Consummation of Marriage and Spiritual Beliefs Analyzed

Factual Background In the case of Aiyappa M.B. v. State of Karnataka petition contesting the actions taken for violations of Section 498-A read in conjunction with Section 34 of the Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The woman lived in her marital house for a short period of time […]

Image

20/06/2023, 3 years ago

Delhi High Court Rules CruzOil as Registrable, Exempt from Trade Marks Act

Background Matrix  In the Matter of Navaid Khan v. Registrar of Trade Marks Office The Registrar of Trade Marks’ decision to register the appellant’s device mark “CruzOil” was challenged in an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act of 1999. The Registrar raised an objection under Section 9(1)(b) of the Act on the […]

Image

20/06/2023, 3 years ago

Madras High Court Directs YouTuber Savukku to Pay Rs. 1 Lakh to TNSLSA and Comply with Court Orders

Factual Background  In the Matter Senthil Balaji v A Shankar, Savukku Shankar violated the court’s order of interim injunction, which forbade him from making any disparaging remarks or videos about Tamil Nadu Minister V. Senthil Balaji, according to an application filed by Senthil Balaji seeking to take action against him under Order 39 Rule 2-A […]

1 … 27 28 29 30 31 … 79

The Legal Affair © 2026 Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions