Introduction:

In a recent hearing before the Karnataka High Court, a parents’ body expressed dissatisfaction with the government’s proposal to conduct board exams for certain classes without consulting them. Counsel A Velan argued for parental consultation, citing fundamental rights and international covenants. However, the court noted the limited scope of parental rights in policy matters and emphasized the role of elected representatives.

Arguments:

Counsel A Velan argued for parental consultation in board exam decisions, highlighting concerns over student well-being and parental rights. In contrast, the Court pointed out the role of elected representatives in policy matters and questioned the request for adjournments by advocates representing private schools.

Court’s Judgment:

The Karnataka High Court acknowledged parental concerns but affirmed the limited scope of parental rights in policy matters. The court criticized the practice of seeking adjournments and emphasized the responsibility of advocates to address the court promptly. The matter was adjourned for further submissions.