Introduction:

In a significant move, the Supreme Court has issued directives to state bar councils, mandating them to submit status reports regarding compliance with Rule 26 of Schedule III to the Rules of Legal Education, 2008. This order is a response to a public interest litigation (PIL) urging the publication of a list of seasoned lawyers willing to mentor law students during college vacations. The petition highlights concern about the challenges faced by law students, particularly those lacking influential contacts, in securing meaningful internships. The PIL, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, is currently being heard by a bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta.

Arguments:

The petitioner emphasized the absence of a compiled list of senior advocates willing to mentor interns, causing difficulties for law students in securing valuable internships. The plea underscores the impact on students without influential contacts, who often struggle to secure internships. The Bar Council of India (BCI) assured the Supreme Court last year that the preparation of the list was underway, with instructions to state bar councils to compile their lists.

Court’s Judgement:

The Supreme Court, taking a proactive stance, has instructed state bar councils to file status reports affirming their adherence to Rule 26 within six weeks. This move aims to ensure compliance with the mandate to prepare a district-wise roster of senior counsel willing to mentor law students during vacations. The court’s emphasis on inclusivity and mentorship aligns with efforts to enhance the legal education environment.