Introduction:
In the case of Suvendu Adhikari & Anr. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. (Case No: WPA(P) 153 of 2025), the Calcutta High Court addressed the aftermath of communal violence in Murshidabad district, West Bengal, which erupted during protests against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The division bench, comprising Justices Soumen Sen and Raja Basu Chowdhury, directed the state government to compensate and rehabilitate victims, and to consider establishing a permanent Border Security Force (BSF) camp in the affected areas.
Arguments Presented:
Petitioners’ Submissions:
The petitioners highlighted the severe impact of the violence on the Hindu community, citing the displacement of over 500 individuals from the Shamsherganj Police Station area to Malda district. They argued that the state’s response was inadequate, leading to loss of life, property, and livelihood. The petitioners requested the court to ensure proper rehabilitation, compensation, and enhanced security measures, including the deployment of central forces.
State’s Response:
Represented by Senior Counsel Mr. Kalyan Bandyopadhyay, the state government contended that it had taken appropriate measures to restore law and order. An affidavit submitted detailed the blocking of 1,093 social media accounts since April 11, 2025, to curb misinformation. The state also sanctioned ₹3,69,60,000 for rehabilitating 283 identified families, providing relief for reconstructing their homes. Additionally, the state reported the deployment of additional BSF companies and the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the incidents.
Court’s Judgment:
The court observed that the victims were in a “sorry state of affairs,” with their homes vandalized, livelihoods destroyed, and belongings looted. It noted the victims’ trauma and the common grievance of inadequate police assistance during the violence. Acknowledging the steps taken by the civil administration post-incident, the court emphasized the need for further action.
The bench directed the state to circulate the list of victims prepared by the Committee on April 27, 2025, among the parties and respond regarding their rehabilitation and compensation. The court mandated that victims be restored to their original places after rebuilding confidence in the system and, in the interim, be provided with proper shelter and accommodation.
Recognizing the victims’ demand for a permanent BSF camp, the court instructed the state to consider this request seriously. To assess the damage accurately, the court ordered the Committee to appoint a valuer from the High Court’s panel to evaluate the extent of destruction and submit a report. All associated costs were to be borne by the administration.
The matter was adjourned for a later date, with the court expecting detailed affidavits and reports from the state and central governments.